I think it is a safe assumption that many fantasy writers have never been hunting in real life. Really, why sit in a stuffy deer blind with no AC or toilet for hours on end when you could be reading books and sipping tea in your favorite armchair?
When it comes to hunt scenes, most people don’t notice the common inaccuracies because they are pretty consistently incorporated across TV and books. However, if someone is looking to appease the tiny demographic of fantasy-reading hunters, these are the things I’ve noticed books most frequently get wrong about hunting.

And why would you WANT to kill this magnificent giant? I mean, look at him. By the laws of natural selection, he should live a nice, long life and the chance to have lots of equally pretty babies.
Game regularly comes in the size of midsize automobiles.
In truth, wild animals tend to be on the small side. The average wild boar, for example, will probably more resemble the dimensions of a Golden Retriever versus his overfed, domesticated cousin. (Unless a petty Greek deity is involved.)
Rabbits, pheasants, and other game are also pretty small, so just one of these is most likely not going to feed your group of five daring adventurers—unless they’re omnivorous pixies.

Things get notoriously messy when it comes to bagging birds. It’s the feathers. Feathers everywhere.
Insta-death.
It is one of the more icky realities, but the clean, tidy kills we get on TV and in books are more than a little censored. In reality, animals pretty much never die straightaway, especially if you’re using a bow and arrow. Even if shot perfectly through the heart, animals are still capable of running several hundred yards before collapsing and in some cases can continue thrashing for several minutes.
More than a little disturbing, but true.
Stalking vs. Lying in Wait
Writers really like having their characters go gallivanting off into the woods to stalk their prey instead of setting up a perch and waiting for unsuspecting prey to come along. But moving through the forest “unseen and unheard” is hard. Very hard. Actual hunter-gatherer peoples spend years and years learning to stalk effectively and it’s still not easy. Even the best hunters come home empty-handed quite often.

Wild bacon seeds can be plentiful at the right time of year, especially in areas with few natural predators, but even these brazen little piggies can be hard to pinpoint.
The forest is a 24/7 buffet.
One thing that bothers me is characters going off on hunts at random times of day, but nature is not your neighborhood Walgreens. Most animals only come out at dawn or dusk and hide for the rest of the day. Sure, you could theoretically go track them down, but it would take a long time and you’d have to basically be a freaking ninja as mentioned earlier.
In short, hunting is not nearly as glamorous or easy as we fantasy writers tend to make it sound. It’s icky and laborious and you’re probably better off just packing lots of lembas bread.
LOL Thanks for this! I owned a horse for many years. Books with horses in them, written by non-horsey writers, bugs the begeezus out of me! If you want to write about things you don’t know, that’s great…but do a little research first. 😉 (Lembas bread is the better way to go!)
LikeLiked by 1 person
OH DON’T GET ME STARTED ON HORSES! There’s a whole other post on that one.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Reblogged this on Kaitlyn Deann, author and commented:
Thank you, Elisabeth! I actually just wrote a hunting scene yesterday.
LikeLike
Ooh…was that a spoiler? 😛
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mmmmmmm, maybe, if I was a cruel author and that’s what I considered a “spoiler” 😉
LikeLike
Thanks for the informative post!! I’ll remember to come back to this for any hunting scenes I may write…
Lembas is always the best way to go. (Unless there are hobbits involved, of course…)
LikeLiked by 1 person
No, when hobbits are involved, you have to double or triple pack at least.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Of course! 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
Nice post, Elisabeth. I agree that hunting is icky and not glamorous. I do my hunting with a camera. 🙂 I used to shoot stills for a hunting and fishing show. There were some fun moments, but I never enjoyed the killing. There is no research like being there, though.
sherry @ fundinmental
LikeLike
Personally, I understand that hunters, for the most part, give the animals much cleaner deaths than natural predators and so long as they’re not just taking trophies…anyway, I don’t really enjoy that part either. Bawled my eyes out last time I went.
LikeLike
YES! Thank you for this post. 😀 As the daughter and granddaughter of redneck hunters I also find it annoying when books get hunting wrong.
I’m going to save this page for people I know, so I can send it to them when they need info.
LikeLike
Haha! You flatter me. Once you know the truth, there’s no going back. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
very true! 😀
LikeLike
Interesting post Elisabeth. I’ve noticed this with books and films too. Have you ever seen The Deer Hunter? A great film, but the hunting scenes are pretty ludicrous.
LikeLike
Pity. One would expect something better from a movie titled “The Deer Hunter”!
LikeLike
Nice work. I sit corrected with my teacup in hand. What about when the hunter becomes the hunted? Any thought on that?
Anna from elements of emaginette
LikeLiked by 1 person
Usually, ninety minutes of Schwarzenegger blundering around a jungle with lots of profanity and gore.
JK. Depends on the situation, really.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Pingback: Things fantasy books (almost always) get wrong about deer – Inkspelled Faery